Georgian TTS
Turn reviewed Georgian text into spoken content and voice-assistant replies.
Ertaoza · Our models
Ertaoza has its own TTS, STT and LLM models. Together, they support the speech and language work behind a Georgian conversation. This overview explains what each model does so you can start with the right component rather than treating every AI task as the same problem.
Speech → text
Text and context → response
Response text → speech
Use TTS when the input is written text and the desired output is speech. Use STT when the input is a recording or spoken request and you need text. Use an LLM to process language and context. A conversational assistant can combine all three; a text-to-audio task may only need TTS.
Turn reviewed Georgian text into spoken content and voice-assistant replies.
Speech recognition for Georgian transcripts and the input to a spoken conversation.
Language processing between a person’s request, approved context and a useful response.
Text-to-speech turns written content into a spoken output. It belongs in voice replies, audio versions of articles and spoken instructions. In a project review, listen for the pronunciation of names and numbers, phrasing and whether the reading is easy to follow.
Georgian TTS — text to speechSpeech-to-text, also called automatic speech recognition or ASR, produces text from speech. It can serve transcription or provide the input to a voice assistant. Evaluation should include the actual channel, background noise and terminology the system will encounter.
Georgian STT — speech recognitionA large language model processes text and helps generate a context-aware response. An LLM can work with the output of STT and prepare a response for TTS. It is not automatically a source of verified business facts and does not by itself authorize changes in external systems.
Georgian LLM — language modelFor an audio version of an existing article, begin with a reviewed text and TTS. For a transcript of a conversation, begin with STT and a correction workflow. For questions about approved business information, define the knowledge source and the LLM’s answer boundaries.
For a full voice agent, also define the integration and action layer. The distinction helps separate a model error, a source-information error and a failure in a connected service.
Agree on representative Georgian examples, the intended environment and clear acceptance criteria. Test model outputs separately, then evaluate the complete conversation. Review the data-handling requirements before exchanging recordings or documents.
This overview does not substitute for a version-specific model card. Architecture, training data, licensing, model access and measured performance need explicit documentation; ownership alone does not establish those details.
Yes. Ertaoza has its own models in these three areas. Each has a dedicated page describing its role, relevant use cases and the questions to resolve for a project.
This website does not make that claim. Model ownership and the technical training approach are different questions. No architecture, training-data size or training-from-scratch specification is published here.
This section is a model overview, not a download repository or API reference. Contact Ertaoza to discuss the required access and delivery format; do not assume a public endpoint or an open-source licence.
No benchmark numbers are published on these pages. An evaluation should identify the model version, test data, metric and test conditions before making a performance comparison.
Model roles are described here without fabricated technical specifications, benchmark scores, release versions or licensing terms.
Ertaoza · Updated
Describe the language, channel and result you need. Start with non-sensitive examples; agree on access and data handling before sharing recordings or customer information.
Discuss the model your project needs